When comparing element table reaction forces in ELBOW290 with those in PIPE289 and BEAM188 for identical model,
the table of reaction forces for elements 289 and 188 agree with each other but not with ELBOW290.
For ELBOW290, FX is reported as a constant value and this value appears to be an average of the variable list of numbers reported for 289 and 188.
Is this by design?
|
This is a defect (DE30176) in R14 that has been corrected for R14.5. |
||
|